#1 For LLM & PhD Law Students
UPLOAD DOCUMENT
Editing the world 24/7
Based in
New Zealand
Proofreading
Editing and Rewriting
Trusted By
10,000+ Clients

Constitutions Compared – The Charter for the Kingdom

The Charter (Statuut) for the Kingdom represents a de-colonization scheme devised in the 1950s. Rather than separating from what was left of the Dutch colonial empire, the overseas territories of Suriname, in South America, and Curacao, a group of island territories in the Caribbean Sea later renamed Netherlands Antilles, placed their relations with the Netherlands proper on an entirely new footing. The three countries set up a quasi-federal Kingdom wherein both the motherland and the two colonies would become autonomous sub-units, which would only exercise certain powers jointly. After Suriname left the Kingdom to become fully independent in 1975, the number of constituent countries fell to two. In 1986 the island of Aruba gained a separate status, leaving the Netherlands Antilles, bringing the number of constituent countries in the Kingdom of the Netherlands back to three: the Netherlands (Europe), the Netherlands Antilles, and Aruba. In 2010 the Netherlands Antilles were dissolved, with the island of Curacao and the Dutch half of the island of Saint Martin gaining Aruba-like separate status, thereby increasing the number of constituent countries in the Kingdom to four. The other three Antillean islands, which were perceived to be not as economically viable as Aruba, Curacao and Saint Martin, were converted into quasi-municipalities of the European Netherlands.

All four current countries are entities in a system that Dutch doctrine describes as a sui generis system with federal characteristics. The countries have a common head of state, which is the Dutch King (Art. 1a Charter for the Kingdom). All three countries furthermore enjoy home rule, each with its own government, parliament, and constitution (Arts. 41 and 42 Charter for the Kingdom). In the case of the overseas countries, this meant far-reaching autonomy from the former Dutch colonial power; in the case of the Netherlands proper, this meant that the Dutch Constitution of 1815 would simply continue to operate for the Kingdom in Europe, the country for which it was devised in the first place, subject to the supremacy of the Charter for the new overarching Kingdom (Art. 5 (2) Charter for the Kingdom). The Charter designates some core powers to be exercised Kingdom-wide through institutions common to the Kingdom’s four constituent countries, most notably foreign affairs and defence, as well as matters concerning citizenship and naturalization, extradition and immigration (Art. 3 Charter for the Kingdom). Effectively, the pre-Charter Netherlands proper agreed to transfer these core powers to the new quasi-federal Kingdom.

 

Download the full pdf: constitutions prepared

Author(s): Aalt W. Heringa & Philipp Kiiver

Related Posts

RECENT ARTICLES

August 16, 2016
Who is Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior?
June 22, 2016
Who is John Finnis?
February 11, 2016
Who is Jerome Frank?
September 7, 2016
Who is Jeremy Bentham?
September 9, 2018
Who is Herbert Lionel Aldophus Hart (H.L.A. Hart)?
May 9, 2018
Who is Cicero?
July 29, 2018
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

REJECTED BY EXAMINERS

Did you know that seven out of ten theses are rejected due to incorrect referencing styles? We frequently re-edit theses that have already been proofread by other companies. Many proofreading services struggle to properly follow the OSCOLA or Bluebook referencing guidelines because it can be complex and time-consuming. Consequently, your thesis is unlikely to proceed to an oral examination until these errors are corrected.

Money Back Guarantee!

We are proud to offer a comprehensive Moneyback Guarantee that encompasses three vital services designed to ensure your satisfaction and the quality of your work.

WhatsApp: +642108231046
We are online 24/7

UPLOAD DOCUMENT